Contact Us 
305-661-4236 
877-767-3832 
877-POSE-TEC 
  home  |  news  |  contact  |  register  |  search  |  help  | 
GRAVITY ROLE IN RUNNING
Click here to send this page to a friend
LAST 5 ARTICLES
CATEGORIES
ARTICLES INFO
Would you like to reprint Dr.Romanov's Training Articles? Click here to find out how >
Click here to return to the front page of Training Section
FREE WEEKLY Expert Advice. Login here every week to read Dr.Romanov's advice on various training related topics. You're welcome to email your questions to support@posetech.com and we'll make sure to cover the requested topic. This section is updated every Tuesday.
September 06, 2005
GRAVITY ROLE IN RUNNING

People have been thinking about the role of gravity in movement throughout the entire time of recorded history. Some of these thoughts were very insightful, as those of Leonardo da Vinci, for example, who considered the body weight to be the major cause of human (and animal) movement.

Newtonian mechanics allowed us to see gravity as the main component of interaction between physical bodies and calculate different parameters of this interaction. Modern times mechanics applied to human movement, called biomechanics, got developed to a very sophisticated level and helped us to understand human movement better and successfully apply this knowledge to our everyday practice.

Nevertheless there are some questions here which are still unsolved and became topics of heated discussions. One of them is the question of gravity's role in running. According to classical mechanics and modern biomechanics, gravity is neutral in horizontal direction of movement in running, and this postulate was never challenged until now. But today this paradigm doesn't fit with many facts emerging both from everyday practice and science research.

The predominant explanation of horizontal propulsion in running is the one attributing it to the work performed by muscles and tendons. This seems to be an obvious assumption from available science data and just from common sense. But knowing that gravity is the most powerful mechanical force on Earth, it is difficult to avoid thinking of its influence on everything, including any moving or running body as well. It can't be absolutely neutral, there should be some ways to tap into this powerful source of energy and use it to our advantage and maybe incorporate it into running mechanics as a propulsive force as well.

The confirmation for this was found in space travel, during exploration of the Moon. Scientist, Rodolfo Margaria, described the astronauts' experience of walking and running on the Moon as surprising because they couldn't use their usual form of these movements as on Earth and had to change it to skipping and hopping. They still had the same muscle force as on Earth and the same support on the ground, but they couldn't run and walk in the same bipedal manner. It means that they couldn't make a push off. The Moon's gravity force is only 1/6 of the Earth's gravitational force, which seemingly immediately "eliminated" forward propulsion from muscle work. Here the question arises, why couldn't the muscles perform their task? Isn't it easier to do it in reduced gravity?

There is another question to be considered here which arises from a fact from running biomechanics known as "extensor's paradox". The essence of this "paradox" is that any electrical activity (EMG) of powerful front thigh muscles ceases during support time from the midstance to toe off. So, what we thought was the powerhorse of running - propulsive efforts of the push off, doesn't exist in reality, and is basically a myth, which we worship and try to "confirm" by our wrong perception.

It is easy to check it through a simple experiment. Try to move forward from the Pose stance and you'll see that it's only possible when the body leans forward. To continue this discussion, we'll present some science data confirming the discussed logic of the role of gravity in running.

DrRomanov

------------------------------------------------------
Comments

Hi,

I've come to this site, and this article, from the consideration of robotic legs. I'm working on a running robot.

A simple simulated leg I was playing with has shown the same behaviour - the knee actuator needs to do very little work in the push-off hase. It is all in the hip actuation, and a bit from the ankle - in my model.

Being African, I learnt to run barefoot as a kid, but became more sophisticated and injury prone ;-) Time to revert to my childhood.

G

Posted by: Gordon at February 18, 2007 05:05 PM

Miran, this is a good observation. I will offer what I think about this.

Being heavy gives your fall more force, but not more speed. The acceleration of gravity is uniform.

What being heavier requires is more force to hold it up, which takes away from speed, as we know we can lift lighter things faster than heavier things.

In addition to that, moving the legs themselves may be harder if the legs are heavier too, as most heavy people's are since they are a region of dense muscle and fat storage.

Posted by: Jordan Hill at June 13, 2006 03:49 PM

Dear Doc Romanov

I am using the pose after being introduced to it by a running club member and it is proving to be very successful.

Posted by: DAVID BURNS at November 1, 2005 09:33 PM

Jerry,
extensor's paradox is the fact was found in research "The Extensor Paradox Experiment" McClay, Lake, and Cavanagh, 1990, Biomechanics of distance running, p.179-186, that the electrical activity of major extensor's muscles( quads) of the legs are ceased after the body pass the midstance or vertical position of the body. At this point, which we call propulsive push off phase, as shown at this research, our muscles do not work for this matter. It does mean, that we do not do push off as we used to think.
Dr.Romanov

Posted by: Dr.Romanov at September 8, 2005 11:42 AM

I am anxious to hear more about the "extensor's paradox". Also, I have the idea that when the body is moving forward rapidly, it is difficult for get much propulsive effect from a push off - in effect, it has mostly already been neutralized by the forward movement. Please comment.

Thank you.

Jerry

Posted by: Jerry Griffin at September 6, 2005 10:18 AM

One question: Why then heavier (bigger) runners aren't faster ? Greater force of gravity and from that greater horitontal force of gravity too. ( F= mg and from greater mass force of gravity is greater) In reality is just opposite. Lighter and stronger runner are always better and more efficience. Just look at elite from midle distance to marathon. Ideal for elite is to have more strength and be lighter. Excuse me for my question but I simple dont't understand that.
Best regards,
Miran

Posted by: Miran at September 6, 2005 06:15 AM
Pose-Shop
Pose Method®
Pose Techniques
Pose Clinics
Coaches' Corner
Training
Video Blog
Online Library
Pose Forums
Click here to follow us on tweeter! Click here to join us on Facebook! Click here to watch our FREE educational videos on YouTube! Check out our photos on Picasa
Click here to find out more
home  |  search  |  register  |  contact  |  company  |  legal  |  © 2009 Pose Tech Corp.

© Copyright 1997-2009. All rights reserved. The contents of POSE TECH may not be copied, reproduced, distributed, or published, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Pose Tech Corporation. Some material reprinted with permission. For copyright information, please visit our legal info pages. To unsubscribe from our opt-in email lists, please visit our Unsubscribe page.